This writer traded a black and tan hound pup for my first shotgun at the age of 10. As a former U.S. Marine, Police Officer, Federal Prison Guard, and hunter I have had a life long relationship with firearms. I agree with the authorities who believe there is a need for controls on firearms to limit their easy access by the criminal community. I agree that background checks, waiting periods, and tighter regulations on dealers are necessary steps to attain this goal. I do not agree with the fringe groups who want to disarm decent American citizens. Their contention that the presence of a firearm in the home increases crime is exactly opposite of the reality. Any unbiased evaluation of world history will show that crime is reduced by arming the citizens.
Criminals prey on the vulnerable and avoid those who are capable of defending themselves. A simple survey of crime victims will demonstrate this. Women, the elderly, children, and men disabled by alcohol or for other reasons are much more likely to be victims of violent crime than other groups. Arming the vulnerable reduces the likelihood of criminal attack. This is demonstrated by the increase in armed robberies on tourists in Florida. Permitting Florida citizens to carry firearms forced the thugs to prey on victims they knew had just gotten off a plane and were unarmed. This allowed the police departments to shift their patrol concentration to tourist areas and resulted in a record reduction in overall crime.
Several states have enacted concealed carry laws in recent years in spite of the opposition by anti-firearm groups. This alone should demonstrate the American public's recognition that there is a need for self defense beyond the responsibility of the police. The tragic murders of the school children in Scotland could have been prevented or at least some of the victims saved had the school officials been armed. Waiting for the police resulted in more deaths. Reasonable control on gun owners is a good idea. Disarming America will result in anarchy.